Prevolio

Tax Incidence & the Laffer Curve

Put a tax on a market and see who really pays it — buyers or sellers — how much value it destroys, and why raising the rate can't raise revenue forever.

See that the side a tax is placed on doesn't decide who bears it — elasticity does — and that raising the rate eventually lowers revenue.

  • Tax incidence
  • Statutory vs. economic burden
  • Elasticity
  • Deadweight loss
  • The Laffer curve

Guided walkthrough

Step 1 of 4

Start at the default tax with equally steep demand and supply. Notice how the burden splits between the buyer price and the seller price.

When buyers and sellers are equally responsive, how is the tax shared between them?

Who bears the tax — the wedge, revenue, and deadweight loss

Demand meets supply at the no-tax price. A per-unit tax opens a wedge: buyers pay the higher price, sellers keep the lower one. The shaded rectangle is government revenue; the amber triangle is the deadweight loss — trades the tax destroyed.

Buyer price75
Seller price (take-home)45
Tax wedge30
Government revenue1,350
Deadweight loss225
Buyers' share50%

The Laffer curve: revenue vs. tax rate

Government revenue as the tax rate sweeps from zero to the choke rate. It climbs, peaks, then falls — past the peak, a higher rate raises less. The dashed line marks your current rate; the green dot marks the revenue-maximizing rate.

What is tax incidence?

Tax incidence is about who really bears the cost of a tax — which can differ completely from who legally hands over the money. The side a tax is placed on (statutory incidence) does not decide who actually pays it (economic incidence). What decides the split is elasticity: how responsive buyers and sellers are to price. The more inelastic side — the one less able to walk away — bears more of the burden, because it changes its behaviour least when the price moves against it. Put a tax on gasoline and drivers, who can't easily cut back, shoulder most of it no matter whether the law taxes the station or the customer. A tax also drives a wedge between what buyers pay and what sellers receive, so some mutually beneficial trades stop happening — that lost value is deadweight loss, a cost on top of the revenue raised. And revenue itself has limits: the Laffer curve notes that beyond some rate, a higher tax shrinks the taxed activity so much that revenue falls rather than rises.

How the simulation shows it

You place a tax on a market and watch the burden split between buyers and sellers shift as you change how elastic each side is — the inelastic side always pays more. You also see the deadweight-loss wedge open up, and push the rate up until revenue peaks and then falls along the Laffer curve.

Common misconceptions

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between statutory and economic incidence?
Statutory incidence is who the law requires to pay the tax; economic incidence is who actually bears the cost after prices adjust. They can be completely different.
What determines who bears a tax?
Elasticity. The side less able to change its behaviour when the price moves — the more inelastic side — bears more of the burden, whichever side the tax is legally placed on.
What is deadweight loss from a tax?
The value of mutually beneficial trades that no longer happen because the tax drives a wedge between what buyers pay and sellers receive. It's a cost beyond the revenue collected.
What is the Laffer curve?
The idea that revenue rises with the tax rate only up to a point; beyond it, the higher rate shrinks the taxed activity so much that total revenue falls.
Does taxing sellers protect buyers?
No. Whether the tax is placed on sellers or buyers, the market splits the burden the same way — set by elasticity — so taxing the seller doesn't spare the buyer.

Related concepts