EconSim

Prospect Theory: Loss Aversion & Framing

Feel why a possible loss looms larger than an equal gain — and how the framing of a bet flips the choice.

See why people are risk-averse for gains but risk-seeking to avoid losses, and how framing exploits that asymmetry.

  • Loss aversion (λ)
  • Reference dependence & framing
  • Diminishing sensitivity
  • Probability weighting
  • Expected value vs. prospect value

Guided walkthrough

Step 1 of 3
Predict first

With the default favorable bet, compare its expected value to its prospect value.

Before you act, predict what will happen. The expected value is positive — why would a person still turn the bet down? Then do it — did your prediction match what happened?

$
$
$

The value function

Subjective value bends differently for gains and losses: concave above the reference point, convex and steeper below it. The dots are the gamble's two outcomes.

Expected value+$10A risk-neutral gambler takes this bet.
Prospect value-20.5A loss-averse person skips this bet.