Spend a fixed income on two goods and find the bundle that makes you best off.
Understand a budget as a real boundary on choice — why getting more of one good means giving up another, and where the best affordable bundle sits.
Raise the price of good A.
Before you act, predict what will happen. Which way does the budget line move — and does the best bundle stay put? Then do it — did your prediction match what happened?
The budget line and your best bundle
Every point on the blue line spends all your income; utility peaks where an indifference curve just touches it.
A budget constraint is the set of combinations of goods a person can afford given a fixed income and the prices they face. Draw two goods on a graph and the budget line is the boundary: every bundle on or below it is affordable, everything above it is out of reach. Its slope is the ratio of the two prices — the rate at which the market lets you trade one good for the other, which is the real opportunity cost of each good in terms of the other. Spending more on one thing necessarily means less for something else; that trade-off, not just running out of money, is the heart of scarcity. Within what you can afford, the best bundle gives the most total satisfaction (utility). Because of diminishing marginal utility — each extra unit adds a little less than the last — the optimum spreads spending across goods rather than pouring it all into one. The best affordable choice is where the marginal utility per dollar is equal across goods, so no reshuffling of the budget could make you better off.
You split a fixed income between two goods and watch the budget line and your total utility update as you move along it, then change income or a price and see the whole line pivot or shift. Finding the best bundle yourself makes the trade-off concrete: more of one good always costs you some of the other.